Texas Sues Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Georgia and Arizona Over Flawed Election 12/9/20

 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v-tb11okydc&feature=emb_rel_end

Viva Frei Vlawg, a videoblog I watch gives the best explanation of Texas Texas vs. Corrupt Democrat States in this election. Gives good details on each state. Good for Later reference.

Leaked video Shows China Forging US Ballots; Will Trump Use Martial Law?...

Giuliani presents evidence at election hearing in Arizona

Scytl Frankfurt servers containing ballot data seized;

WE WILL NOT COMPLY

 ***WE WILL NOT BE RULED! - WE WILL NOT COMPLY!***

************AMERICAS NEW WAR CRY!*******

*******We Will Fight Our Oppressor's With Mass Non-Compliance****** If a legislature cannot - will not - or refuse to - legislate on behalf of the citizens the result must be oppression, repression, or revolution! On January 6th, 2021 if Donald Trump is NOT inaugurated, the citizens of the United States have No Obligation to be Ruled as Servile Subjects and will Revolt with Mass Non -Compliance. Stores will reopen - businesses will start producing and citizens will go Back to Work Presenting a United Front and Mass Peaceful Non- Compliance to an Illegally Elected Government.

I am asking you to help defend America.

 Well, Mr. Franzese, the government, and the organizations they work thru all operate like the Mafia. The Communist/Socialists BLM, Antifa are not going to stop. Any more than any other mob. would stop in a hostile takeover or mob war.

Saul Alinsky, the infamous Commie organizer, learned from Al Capone. He was a primitive gangster. We need a wise, smart gangster to have a sit down on how you would fight back; with gangster methods. *It would be an exciting series*. Pose it as a hypothetical.

Tell us both sides. How would you take over BLM? How would you deal with ANTIFA? 

Fighting in protests is counterproductive. What's better, beating select influential leaders and intimidating them.

How would you organize protests and protect, use your guys, and handle the violence? The Mob and Unions have done a lot of business together. You must have some ideas.

How would you use violence, intimidation, extortion, the other mob tools, etc.?

I am asking you to help defend America. Decent Americans have no idea how to fight back.

You used your brains to make a fortune; now, please use your brains and experience to help America before we lose it.

My father was an associate and a hijacker. Later on, he ran a card room in the old Chase hotel in downtown Kansas City for the Civella family. He kept it mostly away from me, and I have never been associated. I have great respect for you both as an earner, your respect for your father, and a Christian. It takes balls to live the life honorably.

I see this as a fight we must win, and we must do what we must, or indeed the devil will take us.

Think about it.

A Brief History of Nonwhite Slave Owners in America

 

https://mises.org/wire/brief-history-nonwhite-slave-owners-america

• 

46 COMMENTS

TAGS U.S. HistoryWorld History

11/09/2020Lipton Matthews

The study of slavery is one of the most contentious issues in contemporary America. But frequently this history is abused by thinkers across the spectrum to score political points. To understand the complexity of such an institution, we must desist from underestimating the role of minorities such as African Americans and Native Americans in it. For much of history, slavery was the norm, and by downplaying nonwhites' involvement, we diminish their humanity. Pursuing one's self-interest to acquire profit or power is consistent with human nature. Depicting minorities as innately virtuous relegates them to the status of infants. Instead, we should aim to highlight their autonomy as rational agents who sought to fulfill specific objectives in the context of a slave economy. Blacks and American Indians possessed the capacity to be just as calculating as white slave owners, and it is patronizing to suggest that they failed to perform as self-interested actors.

One of the earliest reports on black slave owners was pioneered by historian and activist Carter G. Woodson. Woodson advanced what is widely known as the theory of "benevolent slaveholding." According to this view, black slaveholders primarily purchased relatives and friends from white masters to provide them with a better quality of life. To curtail the growth of the free black population, restrictive laws were instituted, thus making it difficult for black slave owners to manumit slaves without approval from the state. In South Carolina, for example, after 1820 free blacks who bought relatives, spouses, or friends had to receive permission from the state prior to manumitting enslaved Americans. Hence, purchasing black slaves from white owners was a strategy used by free blacks to secure a greater degree of freedom for their loved ones. Indeed Woodson's thesis remains popular among academics, as adumbrated by Philip J. Schwarz: "Increasingly restrictive legislation, stringent economic conditions, the choice of many free blacks to own other blacks only temporarily, and perhaps the aversion of other Afro-Americans to human bondage guaranteed, that free black possession of human property would be significant only as an anomaly, not as a typical experience." Though Woodson's theory is still influential, many have charged that he minimized the materialistic tendencies of African American slave owners. 

Larry Koger in his groundbreaking text Black Slaveowners: Free Black Masters in South Carolina, 1790–1860 disputes the dominant narrative propagated by disciples of Woodson:

When Carter G. Woodson asserted that free blacks purchased slave relatives and friends, he was quite correct. However, free blacks who held loved ones bought other slaves to be exploited for profit. To classify these transactions as benevolent would be a mistake. Even though these slaveowners usually demonstrated benevolent behavior towards their slave relations and friends, a commercial and materialistic exchange existed between them and their slaves purchased as investments. In fact, the free blacks who maintained a dual relationship with their slaves had no universal commitment against slavery. To them, slavery was an oppressive institution when it affected a beloved relative or a trusted friend, but beyond that realm, slavery was viewed as a profit-making institution to be exploited.

Other scholars implore us to not be shocked that blacks in America expressed an interest in owning slaves, as summarized by Calvin Wilson: "The Negroes brought with them from their native land African ideas and customs. Many of those brought thence to America had been slaves in their own lands. Others had been owners of slaves in Africa. In both cases, they were used to slavery. It did not, therefore, seemed unnatural for a Negro in America to hold his brethren in bondage when he had become free and able to buy his fellows."

Also, like their white peers, some black slave owners were notorious for their brutality. Ronald E. Hall in his landmark publication An Historical Analysis of Skin Colour Discrimination: Victimism among Victim Group Populations challenges the assumption that black owners were always humane using the example of William Ellison: "William Ellison is prominent for both his wealth and the cruelty toward his black slaves, for which he was known among Southern blacks and whites. Historians for whatever reasons have attempted to justify his version of victim-group discrimination perhaps as a matter of political correctness."

Yet if you assume that Hall’s commentary on Ellison is an anomalous case, then maybe this condemnation of black slave owners by a Louisiana slave featured in Frederick Law Olmstead’s Journeys and Explorations in the Cotton Kingdom will alter your perspective: “You might think, master, dat dey would be good to dar own nation; but dey is not. I will tell you de truth, massa; I know I’se got to answer; and it’s a fact, dey is very bad masters, sar. I’d rather be a servant to any man in de world, dan to a brack man. If I was sold to a brack man, I’d drown myself. I would dat—I’d drown myself! Dough I shouldn’t like to do dat nudder; but I wouldn’t be sold to a coloured master for anything.” Clearly, Woodson’s thesis is untenable.

With greater potency than most writers Hall discredits the position that black slaveholders were mainly motivated by humanitarian concerns:

In most instances of black slave ownership, the records suggest that blacks who owned black slaves did so for the same reasons as whites: profit….Astonishingly, in 1860 there existed at least six Negroes—likely light-skinned—living in Louisiana who owned 65 or more slaves. Among them C. Richards and P.C. Richards who owned 152 of their black brethren as slaves to work their sugarcane plantation. A similarly impressive Louisiana free Negro Antoine Dubuclet owned in excess of 100 dark-skinned black slaves. He was also in the sugar business and boasted an estate estimated to be worth in (1860 dollars) $264,000. To put Dubuclet's wealth in context, the mean calculation of wealth for Southern white men at the time averaged $3,978.

Similarly, Native Americans were also players in slavery, and it must be noted that the institution existed before the arrival of Europeans. According to the scholar Joyce Ann Kievit: "Many North American Indian tribes practiced some form of slavery before Europeans arrived in North America. The status of slaves varied from tribe to tribe. Some slaves were exploited for labor, others were used for ritual sacrifice, a few provided for the needs of women whose husbands had been slain in war, and many were adopted into the tribes." However, with the introduction of plantation slavery by European settlers, Native Americans became alert to the financial opportunities that could be gained from this venture.

Barbara Krauthamer shrewdly dispels the notion that Native Americans had less interest in exploiting black slaves for monetary benefit:

From the late eighteenth century through the end of the U.S. Civil War, Choctaw and Chickasaw men and women held people of African descent in slavery. Like their white Southern counterparts, Indians bought, sold, owned, and exploited black people's labor and reproduction for social and economic gain. Choctaws and Chickasaws purchased slaves—men, women, and children—to work on their Mississippi farms and plantations and to serve in their homes…Choctaws and Chickasaws understood that slavery allowed for the accumulation of personal wealth.

Neither should we entertain the fable that Indian slave owners were universally generous. R. Halliburton in an intriguing book, Red over Black: Black Slavery among the Cherokee Indians, argued that the treatment meted out to black slaves ranged from kind to excessively atrocious, indicating that generalizations about slave masters are often inaccurate.

To imply that only white people have a vicious ability to calculatingly pursue their interests at the expense of others is insulting to blacks and American Indians. Inherent in humans is the passion to achieve distinct objectives even when they are inconsistent with the goals of the wider group. Romanticizing the history of minorities to portray them as saints is quite dehumanizing. The racist subtext is that white people are uniquely human because they possess the fortitude to outwit competitors. 

Author:

Contact Lipton Matthews

Lipton Matthews is a researcher, business analyst, and contributor to mises.org, The Federalist, and the Jamaica Gleaner. He may be contacted at lo_matthews@yahoo.com or on Twitter (@matthewslipton).

 

 Joe Biden’s political Career by year:

1973 Biden enters politics 1974 1975 1976 1977 Biden fights to keep schools segregated because “allowing blacks to integrate would create a racial jungle” 1978 1979 1980 1981 1982 1983 Biden taxes SS 1984 1985 1986 1987 1988 Ran for president but had to end it after getting busted for plagiarism 1989 1990 C’mon man, almost there 1991 1992 1993 Biden taxes SS again 1994 Biden writes the stop and frisk law which is what African Americans blame for systemic racism today 1995 1996 1997 Almost, not yet because y’know the thing 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Calls Obama the first articulate and clean mainstream African American 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 and now he’s ready to “FIX” the Country. Imagine being so dumb that you think the guy in office for 4 years is the problem and the guy in office for 47 YEARS is the solution

Show less

Presidents resignation speech

 https://video.parler.com/VR/7L/VR7LLR6LhP0e_small.mp4

 SO, YOU'RE VOTING FOR TRUMP, WAAAAY TO GO!

You really shouldn't admit that in public. You give yourself away in the way you posted it. Your name and what you are underneath it.
Like you were advertising your fascism.
*********************
**AntiFascist#1**
Racist for Trump
*********************
Fascism if it comes back will be dressed as anti fascism. Wrapped in the silks of fairness. Ronald Reagan.

STOP THE CHEATING

 SECRETARIES OF STATE WHERE DEMOCRATS ARE CHEATING

Their Attorneys Generals have stopped the vote so they can cheat Conservative voters: 

YOU MUST CALL THESE OFFICES DEMANDING THE STATE CALL THE ELECTION!

MICHIGAN:1-888-767-6424

PENNSYLVANIA:1-717-787-5280

WISCONSIN 1-608-266-8888

NORTH CAROLINA: 1-919-814-5400

GEORGIA:(470)240-5060

ARIZONA: (602) 542-4285

CALL YOU MUST STOP  THE CHEATING

The Bidens are Traitors, Not Just Thieves

 Hunter Biden went to China to get one and a half-billion dollars to invest in China. He then invested in a company called Bohi Harvest? Then they would takes its funds and buy dual-use companies and then sell them back to the Chinese Communists so the could steal the technology. That makes the Bidens traitors, not just thieves.

Cultural Marxist Antonio Gramsci advocated a “long march through the culture,

 Cultural Marxist Antonio Gramsci advocated a “long march through the culture,” subverting a nation through the gradual infiltration and ultimate annexation of its institutional and cultural foundations including education, the media, the judiciary, the entertainment industry, and the political establishment. 

How Joe Biden Betrayed the Seals.

 Navy Seals on Joe Biden [COPY AND SHARE]

Lest We Forget: When he was the Vice President, he did the most unthinkable thing for a man in his position. He revealed the names and the unit that killed Bin Laden "On May 3 2011, at a national event in Washington, Vice President Joseph R. Biden Jr. did the unthinkable - He publicly revealed the identity of the special-operations unit responsible for bin Laden's killing, just to show that he "was in the know". His reckless action put at risk the lives of every member of Seal Team 6. The Taliban and other jihadists eager to avenge bin Laden now knew which unit to target. Stunned and shocked, Seal Team Six members immediately realized they were going to be hunted by al Qaeda sympathizers. Soon after Biden's reckless idiotic speech, an American CH47 Chinook was shot down by a rocket propelled grenade in the Tangi Valley, Maidan Wardak Province, Afghanistan, all 38 aboard were killed including most of Seal Team Six, this incident became known as Extortion 17. After Biden had let the identification out, and before the Chinook was shot down, members of Seal Team 6 had called their families and told them to wipe out all connection to them, including social media, and disassociate themselves as far away from them as possible because they too would be in grave danger as the Taliban would attempt to find them in retaliation.... And Biden, well he didn't even work up a sweat over any of it, and was just too stupid to realize what he had done. I added a couple links here for those who want proof. It's easy enough to look up the information yourself. These are just a few of many. https://youtube/lMA1T9QWEI4 https://special-ops.org/./the-betrayal-of-navy-seal-team-6/. "Someone said..... Well that's just Joe.!" Really? No, this traitor revealed the names and signed the death warrants of America's finest warriors and never looked back. Sorry, if you disagree, but he is not worthy of consideration as our President and Commander-in-Chief!!! Wake up. America can't afford to have this moron as our President!

Blackness a Spiritual Thing.

 How can Bill Clinton, a pasty-faced southern White man could be the first "Black President"? While melanin rich Clarence Thomas, a black Supreme Court Judge could never be?

Race is not a matter of physical features as its a spiritual feeling. A way of looking at the world that is shared with many others of the black race. It is at some times community enforced taboo not, to think in black think.

UNFINISHED

I Never Cared:

 I never cared:

-I never cared if you were “gay” until you started shoving it in my face, and the faces of my children. -I never cared what color you were, until you started blaming my race for your problems. -I never cared about your political affiliation until you started to condemn me for mine. -I never cared where you were born until you wanted to erase my history and blame my ancestors for your current problems. -I never cared if you were well-off or poor, until you said you were discriminated against, when I was promoted because I worked harder. -I never cared if your beliefs were different from mine, until you said my beliefs were wrong. NOW I CARE! My patience and tolerance are gone. I’m not alone in feeling this way, there are millions of us who do......and we have had enough! -Anonymous

What is Black Privilege?

 What is Black Privilege?

1) Privilege is wearing $200 sneakers when you’ve never had a job. 2) Privilege is wearing $300 Beats headphones while living on public assistance. 3) Privilege is having a Smartphone with a Data plan, which you receive no bill for. 4) Privilege is living in public subsidized housing where you don’t have a utility or phone bill and where rising property taxes, rents and energy costs have absolutely no effect on the amount of food you can put on your table, which is largely covered by Government Food Stamps. 5) Privilege is having free health insurance for you and your family that's paid for by working taxpayers who often can't afford proper health coverage for their own families. 6) Privilege is having multiple national organizations promoting and protecting just your race alone -- that are subsidized by federal tax dollars. 7) Privilege is having access to a national college fund that supports only one race. 8) Privilege is having a television network that supports only one race. 9) Privilege is having most of the media news networks refuse to cover incidents wherein one race (one-eighth of the population) commits 50% of the crimes. 10) Privilege is the ability to go march against, and protest against anything that triggers you, without worrying about calling off from work and the consequences that accompany such. 11) Privilege is having as many children as you want, regardless of your employment status, and be able to send them off to daycare or pre-school you don’t pay for. 12) Privilege is being able to vote in many states without showing a driver's license, voter ID card or other credentials -- just because your race claims they should be exempt from such requirements. 13) Privilege is being able to riot, loot, commit arson and tear down historic monuments without consequences -- just because you don't like folks such as Columbus, U. S. Grant or even Lincoln. 14) Privilege is being able to get into almost any college of your choosing based on your race, not your grades or merit. 15) Privilege is having most of your life paid for by the working men and women who DO HAVE TO DEAL WITH RISING TAXES AND COSTS! you know, those you now call “PRIVILEGED.”

More Than 90 Percent of Middle Eastern Refugees on Food Stamps

 

AP Photo/Frank Augstein, File

CAROLINE MAY

10 Sep 20156,499

More than 90 percent of recent refugees from Middle Eastern nations are on food stamps and nearly 70 percent receive cash assistance, according to government data.

According to Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR) data highlighted by the immigration subcommittee staff of Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL) — chairman of the Subcommittee on Immigration and the National Interest — in FY 2013, 91.4 percent of Middle Eastern refugees (accepted to the U.S. between 2008-2013) received food stamps, 73.1 percent were on Medicaid or Refugee Medical Assistance and 68.3 percent were on cash welfare.

Middle Eastern refugees used a number of other assistance programs at slightly lower rates. For example, 36.7 percent received Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF), 32.1 percent received Supplemental Security Income (SSI), 19.7 percent lived in public housing, 17.3 percent were on General Assistance (GA), and 10.9 percent received Refugee Cash Assistance (RCA).

The high welfare rates among Middle Eastern refugees comes as the Obama administration considers increasing the number of refugees — who are immediately eligible for public benefits — to the U.S., particularly Syrian refugees.

ORR defines refugees and asylees from the “Middle East” as being from Afghanistan, Iran, Iraq, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Turkey, and Yemen.

Sessions’ staff notes that that from FY 2008 to FY 2013 the U.S. admitted 115,617 refugees from the Middle East and granted another 10,026 asylum. Additionally the U.S. granted green cards to 308,805 immigrants from those Middle Eastern countries identified by ORR as refugee nations, making them Lawful Permanent Residents (LPRs) eligible to apply for citizenship in five years and petition to have family members come to the U.S.

As of 2013, Sessions’ staff notes, the top ten countries for refugee admission to the U.S. were  Iraq, Burma, Bhutan, Somalia, Cuba, Iran, Congo, Sudan, Eritrea, and Ethiopia.

“More broadly, concerning all immigration, the Migration Policy Institute notes that the U.S. has taken in ‘about 20 percent of the world’s international migrants, even as it represents less than 5 percent of the global population,’ and that 1 in 4 U.S. residents is now either an immigrant or born to immigrant parents,” Sessions staff highlights, noting that the Census is projecting that another 14 million immigrants will come to the U.S. by 2025.