Reported Income and Taxes Paid Both Increased Significantly in 2014

Reported Income and Taxes Paid Both Increased Significantly in 2014

	Top 1%	Top 50%
Share of Total Income Taxes Paid	39.48%	97.25%
Income Split Point	$465,626	$38,173
Average Tax Rate	27.16%	15.52%
Note: Does not include dependent filers

4 more rows

Summary of the Latest Federal Income Tax Data, 2016 Update - Tax ...

https://taxfoundation.org/summary-latest-federal-income-tax-data-2016-update/

These people are the insiders of the Deep state.

Do you realize we had Comey Brennan and Clapper? Head of the FBI

the CIA and the DNI And many of their subordinates apparently seem to be traitors seem to America, to our nation. This is the danger of power at the top these guys want to run things, and they are attempting
a coup. These people are the insiders of the Deep state.

It's weird you read and novels about these kinds of characters in fiction tales and here they are. Evil queen Hillary, evil wizards
Brenner Clapper and Comey, dealing and black magic and sorcery.
You have the useful idiots simply followers that are only used until
they are no longer needed and then disposed of, sometimes
permanently. Can you say Seth rich?

You have the old man fuddy-duddy Mr. Magoo doesn't quite
seem to get it and Sessions.  you have the evil knights in
Mueller, Rothstein and

.

It's amazing I don't think many people actually realize we're going
through a coup now. Not in the future not the past but right at this
moment. Obama and Hillary Clinton Clinton are trying to rest the
power of the government from a duly elected president and keep
and Obama keep his promise the fundamentally changing
America... to Socialist/ Communism

How to create a social state by Saul Alinsky:

    There are eight levels of control that must be obtained before you are able to create a social state.

The first is the most important.

1) Healthcare – Control healthcare and you control the people.
2) Poverty – Increase the poverty level as high as possible; poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them to live.
3) Debt – Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes and this will produce more poverty.
4) Gun control – Remove people’s ability to defend themselves from the government. That way you are able to create a police state.
5) Welfare – Take control of every aspect of people’s lives (food, housing and, income).
6) Education – Take control of what people read and listen to; take control of what children learn in school.
7) Religion – Remove the belief in God from the government and schools.
8) Class warfare – Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to take from (tax) the wealthy with the support of the poor.

LIST OF COMPANIES BOYCOTTING THE NRA

MASS SHOOTINGS PER CAPITA

*AMERICA DOESN'T HAVE THE MOST MASS SHOOTINGS*
                      *LIBERAL MASSAGING THE TRUTH AGAIN*
 A study of global mass-shooting incidents from 2009 to 2015 by the Crime Prevention Research Center, headed by economist John Lott, shows the U.S. doesn't lead the world in mass shootings. In fact, it doesn't even make the top 10, when measured by death rate per million population from mass public shootings.

So who is on tops?

No.1 Norway, with a mass shooting death rate of 1.888 per million
No. 2 is Serbia, at just 0.381
No.3  France at 0.347,
No.4 Macedonia at 0.337, and
No.5 Albania at 0.206.
No.6 Slovakia,
No.7 Finland,
No.8 Belgium,
No.9 Czech Republic
*No.10 Then comes the U.S., at No. 11, with a death rate of 0.089.*

 27% more casualties from 2009 to 2015 per mass shooting incident in the European Union than in the U.S.

"There were 16 cases where at least 15 people were killed," the study said. "Out of those cases, four were in the United States, two in Germany, France, and the United Kingdom."

"But the U.S. has a population four times greater than Germany's and five times the U.K.'s, so *on a per-capita basis the U.S. ranks low in comparison* — actually, those two countries would have had a frequency of attacks 1.96 (Germany) and 2.46 (UK) times higher."

Yes, the U.S. rate is still high, and nothing to be proud of. But it's not the highest in the developed world. Not by a long shot.

Black Panther is an allegory for Trump!

Black Panther is an allegory for Trump!
Wakanda (America) is ruled by King T’Challa (Donald Trump), who is also known as the Black Panther. (President Trump)
T’Challa (President Trump) is big on border security, believes (America and Americans)Wakanda and Wakandans should come first, and fiercely protects his country’s culture from outsiders, including refugees
If this is all starting to sound familiar, it should. Also like President Donald Trump, T’Challa’s beliefs are not based on race. This is not a “black thing.” This is an American culture/survival thing.

Who starts the most wars Republicans Or democrats?

  Indian Wars occurred in every Presidency up to the 20th Century. Many were the results of broken treaties.They will not be counted.

Franco-American Naval War(Quasi-War): John Adams, Federalist(Ancestor Party of the Republicans); See XYZ affair for reason of war

First Barbary War: Thomas Jefferson, Democratic-Republican(Ancestor Party of the Democrats); Tripolitan ransomed American Sailors and tried to blackmail the US. When the US refused the Pasha(equivalent to king) declared war.

Second Barbary War and War of 1812: James Madison, Democratic-Republican; Second Barbary War began the same way as the first only with the Bey of Algiers declaring war. While the War of 1812 can be argued as being a war about sailor's rights, the real motive was Canada.

Mexican-American War: James K. Polk, Democratic; The Republic of Texas had a claim to Land between the Rio Grande and San Antonio(which the US inherited), which was not valid. Polk sent troops to the territory to protect it, and the Mexican government sent troops to drive it out.

American Civil War: Abraham Lincoln, Republican; First fought to preserve the Union(the right to secede is still debated to this day) later to end slavery.

Korea(1876); Ulysses S. Grant, Republican; Called Choson at the time, the country attacked and destroyed an American Navy Vessel. The war was fought with similar motives as Perry's visit to Japan.

Spanish-American War and Philippine Insurrection: William McKinley, Republican; American Naval Ship Maine sent to monitor alleged mistreatment of the civilians of Cuba and protect American economic interests. The ship was destroyed and the press (the real instigators of the war)of the time placed the now doubtful blame on the Spanish. The US fought the war to free Cuba. McKinley announced that giving the Filipinos Independence outright would be like simply handing them over the Germans or Japanese(because of the geographic position) and harm American Economic Interests.

Haiti; Vera Cruz occupation, Pancho Villa, World War I: Woodrow Wilson, Democratic; Troops were sent in to stabilize Haiti, Vera Cruz was occupied to prevent ships from Germany delivering guns to the government. Pancho Villa made several attacks on Americans(because he was not recognized as President of Mexico) forcing Wilson to send troops to capture Villa. WWI involvement was the result of Germany violating Neutrality rights.

Nicaragua: Calvin Coolidge, Republican; Like Haiti the objective was stabilization.

World War II: Franklin D. Roosevelt, Democratic; Asked for the declaration of war after Japan attacked Pearl Harbor. Germany and Italy declared war two days later.

Korean war (1950-54): Harry S. Truman, Democrat; North Korea, in violation of a UN treaty, invaded South Korea. Troops were sent to contain communism.

Vietnam War: Lyndon B. Johnson, Democratic; involvement started after two American gunboats were attacked in the Gulf of Tonkin(the reports have now been proven falsified.).

Grenada: Ronald Reagan, Republican; When a Communist government took over the country, it persecuted the American college students studying there.

Panama, Persian Gulf War Operation Restoring Freedom: George HW Bush, Republican; Noriega, leader of Panama was charged with drug trafficking and through Noriega's power, Panama would declare war(Though retaining the Canal is alleged to be the real motive). Persian Gulf War was fought to Liberate Kuwait from Iraq and protect Saudi Arabia from an Invasion(also to protect oil interests). Troops were sent to Somalia to assist in the feeding the hungry after guerrillas shot up UN aid convoys.

Bosnia, Kosovo, and Iraq: Bill Clinton, Democratic Party; troops were sent to Bosnia to enforce peacekeeping. Yugoslavia was attacked over genocide upon the ethnic Albanians in
Kosovo. Air assaults were done upon Iraq after it failed to comply with UN weapons inspectors.

Afghanistan and Iraq: George W. Bush, Republican; Invasion of Afghanistan was the result of the Taliban ruled government's refusal to hand over Osama bin Laden. Iraq's invasion is still under debate.

Final Score: Democrats: 16
Republicans: 10

Source(s):Wikipedia, Robert Leckie's The Wars of America and maybe half a dozen other sources

THE ANSWER TO MASS SCHOOL SHOOTINGS

This is the answer to mass school shootings. It is the same answer that high-value targets use for their security. The world over

1. Comprehensive security survey (by local law enforcement or security professionals)

2.  Perimeter secured with security fencing.

3. Gates locked and with metal detectors and only opened by security or designated School Employees.

4. Trained and armed security sufficient to cover school grounds adequately.

5. School identification system.

All visitors can be given a temporary identification card that tracks their whereabouts in the building.

The primary focus needs to be switched from education to protection. While, it's unfortunate, that is the world in we presently live. There seems no changing that in the immediate future. The first priority must be in protecting the children while they are in school.

This is simply standard procedure when it comes to securing a soft and vulnerable site

Visitors can be given a temporary identification card that tracks their whereabouts in the building.

It is guns deaths vs defensive gun use and saved lives.

Guns are often used to protect life. A statistic that is seldom mentioned but is very important in the argument. How many time are the used for defGuns are often used to protect life. A statistic that is seldom mentioned but is very important in the argument. How many time are the used for defensive purposes?
The estimates are 55,000 to over 4.5 million. Depending on survey and modality.
Clearly, guns play an important part in safety.

Lower-end estimates include that by David
Hemenway, a professor of Health Policy at the Harvard School of Public Health, which estimated approximately 55,000–80,000 such uses each year.

Higher end estimates include Chiltons polling firm for the Police Foundation on a research grant from the National Institute of Justice.
In 1997 NSPOF projected 4.7 million Defensive Gun Use per year by 1.5 million individuals after weighting to eliminate false positives.[4] Another estimate has estimated approximately 1 million DGU incidents in the United States.

It is guns deaths vs defensive gun use and saved lives.
That is the fairer standard.ensive purposes?
The estimates are 55,000 to over 4.5 million. Depending on survey and modality.
Clearly, guns play an important part in safety.

Lower-end estimates include that by David
Hemenway, a professor of Health Policy at the Harvard School of Public Health, which estimated approximately 55,000–80,000 such uses each year.

Higher end estimates include Chiltons polling firm for the Police Foundation on a research grant from the National Institute of Justice.
In 1997 NSPOF projected 4.7 million Defensive Gun Use per year by 1.5 million individuals after weighting to eliminate false positives.[4] Another estimate has estimated approximately 1 million DGU incidents in the United States.

It is guns deaths vs defensive gun use and saved lives.
That is the fairer standard.

ISLAM IS SATAN'S RELIGION

When St. Mike kicked Satan's ass out of heaven it must have been about 600yrs. ago. That is when Islam was invented. Islam is the Satans religion.

2 Corinthians 4:4)
4 The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God.

Revelation 12:12
12. ... Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.

1 John 5:19
19 We know that we are children of God and that the whole world is under the control of the evil one.

Quran (2:191-193) -
"And kill them wherever you find them...And fight them until there is no more Fitnah [disbelief and worshipping of others along with Allah] and worship is for Allah alone.

Well, the best I can figure Satan goes by the name of Allah these days.

DOES WHITE PRIVILEGE EQUAL BLACK OPPRESSION

Intersectionality

www.dictionary.com/browse/intersectionality

noun. the theory that the overlap of various social identities, as race, gender, sexuality, and class, contributes to the specific type of systemic oppression and discrimination experienced by an individual (often used attributively)

Oppression 

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/oppression

  unjust or cruel exercise of authority

Intersectional politics uses the emotionally laden terms of privilege and oppression wrongly. The terms advantages and disadvantage would be more accurate. Most of these are personal feelings. Feelings are personal you own them. None of these "white privileges equal black oppression".

Read through the list. Do you see any unjust or cruel exercise of authority?

If so which ones?

List of White Privilege Black Oppression

1. I can, if I wish, arrange to be in the company of people of my race most of the time. (She lives in a town 87% white)

2. If I should need to move, I can be pretty sure of renting or purchasing housing in an area that I can afford and in which I would want to live. (Wellesley has a population of 27,000) 3. I can be pretty sure that my neighbors in such a location will be neutral or pleasant to me. ( do you think Asian have that problem or is it Asian privilege?) 4. I can go shopping alone most of the time, pretty well assured that I will not be followed or harassed. (do you think Asian have that problem or is it Asian privilege?)

5. I can turn on the television or open to the front page of the paper and see people of my race widely represented.do

6. When I am told about our national heritage or about “civilization,” I am shown that people of my color made it what it is. (It is predominately and founded is a white European culture) 7. I can be sure that my children will be given curricular materials that testify to the existence of their race.(see 5) 8. If I want to, I can be pretty sure of finding a publisher for this piece on white privilege.( In a very liberal college town but why the assumption a black academic couldn't. Is assumption of racism? Why do you make that conclusion? This Weselly) 9. I can go into a music shop and count on finding the music of my race represented, into a supermarket and find the staple foods that fit with my cultural traditions, into a hairdresser’s shop and find someone who can deal with my hair.( if you lived in a black town the same would be true?) 10. Whether I use checks, credit cards, or cash, I can count on my skin color not to work against the appearance of financial reliability. (You mean another professor that spoke as you do and behave as you do and dress like you do would have that problem?) 11. I can arrange to protect my children most of the time from people who might not like them. (In Wesseley Massachusettes} 12. I can swear, or dress in second-hand clothes, or not answer letters without having people attribute these choices to the bad morals, the poverty, or the illiteracy of my race. 13. I can speak in public to a powerful male group without putting my ra 14. I can do well in a challenging situation without being called a credit to my race. 15. I am never asked to speak for all the people of my racial group. 16. I can remain oblivious of the language and customs of persons of color, who constitute the world’s majority, without feeling in my culture any penalty for such oblivion. 17. I can criticize our government and talk about how much I fear its policies and behavior without being seen as a cultural outsider 18. I can be pretty sure that if I ask to talk to “the person in charge” I will be facing a person of my race. 19. If a traffic cop pulls me over, or if the IRS audits my tax return, I can be sure I haven’t been singled out because of my race. 20. I can easily buy posters, postcards, picture books, greeting cards, dolls, toys, and children’s magazines featuring people of my race. 21. I can go home from most meetings of organizations I belong to feeling somewhat tied in rather than isolated, out of place, outnumbered, unheard, held at a distance, or feared. 22. I can take a job with an affirmative action employer without having coworkers on the job suspect that I got it because of race. 23. I can choose public accommodation without fearing that people of my race cannot get in or will be mistreated in the places I have chosen. 24. I can be sure that if I need legal or medical help my race will not work against me. 25. If my day, week, or year is going badly, I need not ask of each negative episode or situation whether it has racial overtones. 26. I can choose blemish cover or bandages in “flesh” color that more or less match my skin

POLITICAL INTERSECTIONALITY AS RACIST WEAPON TO WHITE SLANDER AMERICAN

Political intersectionality is comparing positive intersectionality to Negative intersectionality and not positive to positive or negative to negative intersectionalities.

Political intersectionality

Is comparing white privilege to black oppression and never recognizing Black privilege to white oppression.The example that exists in our educational system.


************************************************

Political intersectionality is used politically as a weapon by the left they will compare the Positive intersectionality of white's as compared to the negative intersectionality of black.

 Let's look at White Privilege #9 of Peggy Macintosh's White Privilege paper that she wrote some years ago.

White Privilege #9 is the lack of availability of Black people's preferred products such as hair care products in predominantly white neighborhoods or in a predominately white country.

This disparity is considered a Positive intersectionality privilege to white people and negative intersectionality oppression to Black people. In other words, black activist, political speech, White Privilege = Black Oppression and is the hot topic for the Left.
These activists leave out the

**************************************

Peggy McIntosh lives in a community of 87% Caucasians, 12% Asians and 2% Black folks

It is not surprising that stores in that town do not carry an equal amount of preferred black hair care and other products.  To do that is not economically feasible for drugstores.  

Another example points out the intellectual weakness of the intersectionality argument when it is usedused as a political weapon.

In another example, Peggy McIntosh moved and now lives in a completely different town that was 87% black 12% Asian and 2% White.

The difficulty that Peggy would have in finding hair care and other products that white people preferred would be seen as a  black privilege and as white oppression.
Black Privilege = White Opression in Peggy's new home town.

So as you move from one town to another, you may have the privilege, or you may be oppressed.

That's silly.

Let's look at a reverse case in colleges. Black students are given extra points That Caucasians and Asians don't get.

According to intersectionality that would be a positive intersectional privilege for black people and a negative  White intersectional oppression. In colleges in America it is Black Privilge =White Oppression, but you don't hear about that as much.

And in short, American colleges black privilege is not counted, and neither is white oppression which is what the theory states is the way it should be stated,
This is why it is a political weapon and not a serious intellectual position.

Intersectionality being used as a political weapon where White Privilege is counted but black privilege is not, is intersectional malfeasance.

I've coined the term "Political Intersectionality" when comparing positive intersectionality to Negative intersectionality.

In intersectionality, Privilege has to be compared to Privilege intersectionalities and Oppression to Oppression

When the intersectional privilege of white people is counted, but the intersectional privilege of black people are not counted. That is racist White Slander.

Intersectionality is a spurious concept based on the musings of a wealthy white Feminist Professor that lives

In a wealthy white academic township.  To Peggy MacIntosh's credit, she said as much in her forward to her paper "White Privilege". Just Musings.

Racial intersectionality a reason to stop funding such stupid stuff