POLITICAL INTERSECTIONALITY AS RACIST WEAPON TO WHITE SLANDER AMERICAN

Political intersectionality is comparing positive intersectionality to Negative intersectionality and not positive to positive or negative to negative intersectionalities.

Political intersectionality

Is comparing white privilege to black oppression and never recognizing Black privilege to white oppression.The example that exists in our educational system.


************************************************

Political intersectionality is used politically as a weapon by the left they will compare the Positive intersectionality of white's as compared to the negative intersectionality of black.

 Let's look at White Privilege #9 of Peggy Macintosh's White Privilege paper that she wrote some years ago.

White Privilege #9 is the lack of availability of Black people's preferred products such as hair care products in predominantly white neighborhoods or in a predominately white country.

This disparity is considered a Positive intersectionality privilege to white people and negative intersectionality oppression to Black people. In other words, black activist, political speech, White Privilege = Black Oppression and is the hot topic for the Left.
These activists leave out the

**************************************

Peggy McIntosh lives in a community of 87% Caucasians, 12% Asians and 2% Black folks

It is not surprising that stores in that town do not carry an equal amount of preferred black hair care and other products.  To do that is not economically feasible for drugstores.  

Another example points out the intellectual weakness of the intersectionality argument when it is usedused as a political weapon.

In another example, Peggy McIntosh moved and now lives in a completely different town that was 87% black 12% Asian and 2% White.

The difficulty that Peggy would have in finding hair care and other products that white people preferred would be seen as a  black privilege and as white oppression.
Black Privilege = White Opression in Peggy's new home town.

So as you move from one town to another, you may have the privilege, or you may be oppressed.

That's silly.

Let's look at a reverse case in colleges. Black students are given extra points That Caucasians and Asians don't get.

According to intersectionality that would be a positive intersectional privilege for black people and a negative  White intersectional oppression. In colleges in America it is Black Privilge =White Oppression, but you don't hear about that as much.

And in short, American colleges black privilege is not counted, and neither is white oppression which is what the theory states is the way it should be stated,
This is why it is a political weapon and not a serious intellectual position.

Intersectionality being used as a political weapon where White Privilege is counted but black privilege is not, is intersectional malfeasance.

I've coined the term "Political Intersectionality" when comparing positive intersectionality to Negative intersectionality.

In intersectionality, Privilege has to be compared to Privilege intersectionalities and Oppression to Oppression

When the intersectional privilege of white people is counted, but the intersectional privilege of black people are not counted. That is racist White Slander.

Intersectionality is a spurious concept based on the musings of a wealthy white Feminist Professor that lives

In a wealthy white academic township.  To Peggy MacIntosh's credit, she said as much in her forward to her paper "White Privilege". Just Musings.

Racial intersectionality a reason to stop funding such stupid stuff