Migrants Use Almost TWICE The Welfare Benefits As Native-Born Americans

US NEWS

Study Shows Migrants Use Almost TWICE The Welfare Benefits As Native-Born Americans

---

 MAC SLAVO 8 HOURS AGO 960 VIEWS

• 27SHARES
• Share
• Tweet
• Flip

New research has discovered that foreign noncitizens use nearly two times the amount of welfare as native-born Americans. Both legal and illegal aliens fall into the category of foreigners who take from the welfare system.

According to a report by Breitbart, in recently released research by the Center for Immigration Studies (CIS), analysts discovered that about 63 percent of noncitizen households, those who live legally and illegally in the U.S., use some form of public welfare while only about 35 percent of native-born American households are on welfare.

take our poll - story continues below

• Do you think Democrats will push out Representative Ilhan Omar over her anti-Semitism?  

Trending: Yet Another Muslim Rape Gang Is Charged

California and Texas have the most expansive welfare-dependent immigration. For example, more than 7-in-10 noncitizen households in California use at least one form of welfare compared to just 35 percent of native-born American households that use welfare in the state.

In Texas, nearly 70 percent of noncitizen households use welfare. Similar to California, only 35 percent of native-born American households are on welfare. -Breitbart

In an exclusive interview with Breitbart News earlier this week, President Donald Trump said he wanted an end to all welfare-dependent legal immigration that burdens American taxpayers with the costs.

“I don’t like the idea of people coming in and going on welfare for 50 years, and that’s what they want to be able to do—and it’s no good,” Trump said.

And it is an obvious burden.

For what one receives without working for, another must work for without earning.

It’s a vicious and immoral practice to steal money from some in order to give it to others.

The Trump administration is considering a new regulation this year that would limit immigrants’ ability to live off the producers (taxpayers).

It would effectively ban legal immigrants from permanently resettling in the U.S. if they are a burden on American taxpayers.

This would be a net win for those being stolen from (“taxpayers”).

Legal immigration controls suggested by the government would be equal an annual $57.4 billion tax cut — the amount taxpayers spend every year on paying for the welfare, crime, and schooling costs of the country’s mass importation of 1.5 million new, mostly low-skilled legal immigrants.

Article posted with permission from Mac Slavo