Replacement Theory is Not a Theory
Self-loathing liberals despise anything which they even remotely suspect somehow disparages minorities, and that includes all white people
In 2015, Sue Payne, a conservative radio host, was inadvertently included in an internal White House phone call representing the "Task Force of New Americans." This endeavor was led by Cecilia Munoz and was comprised of 16 members of the Obama Cabinet. The Obama-Biden administration had planned to initiate a "country within a country."
Obama's goal was to quickly grant citizenship to 13 to 15 million illegal aliens. As these "new Americans" came forward, the communities where they would be placed would be designated as "receiving communities." As these "new Americans" came out of the shadows, existing U.S. citizens would be pushed into the shadows.
It was emphasized that the newly minted "Americans" must be informed of "the benefits they are entitled to" and that they would "navigate not assimilate." Fortunately, these plans did not materialize.
Trending on PolitiCrossing.com: Janet Yellen Has To Go
Fast Forward to the Present
Jimmy Fallon announced to his studio audience one night that the white population of the U.S. had declined 8.6% in the last ten years, to which his audience responded with boisterous laughter and applause. He was shocked but sought to hide it.
Fallon has said, "The results of the 2020 census just came out. For the first time in American history, the number of white people went down," upon which the predominantly Caucasian audience responded with "glee and elongated clapping."
"Interesting reaction to that," Fallon said. Interesting? More like bizarre. How can a plethora of white individuals, not merely those in attendance that evening but rather untold millions across the nation, loathe themselves so entirely that they revel in seeing their numbers drop? Do Japanese wish to see their numbers decline relative to the country's overall population? Do Chileans? Finns? Jordanians? Tunisians? Tucker Carlson is completely correct on this topic and, as such, is the favorite target of the demented Left.
The Left is Giddy
To be sure, Jimmy Fallon, Jimmy Kimmel, and the ultra-obnoxious Steven Colbert have catered exclusively to 'progressives' for eight years. Progressives populate their audiences, and progressive 'elites' dominate their guest spots.
Amazingly, non-Hispanic whites in the U.S. today represent only 57.8% of the population, their lowest percentage ever and down from above 80% a mere two scores earlier. Is this a cause for celebration? At the Washington Post, uber-RINO columnist Jennifer Rubin joyously greeted the data, citing it as "fabulous news."
Concurrently, if you hint that the demographic decline of white Americans might prove unfavorable, you'll be demonized as a dangerous individual. However, if you seek to eliminate people based on their skin color, and they are white people, this is perfectly okay. Indeed, it's delightful. It's entirely progressive! Let us all rejoice!
Self-Hate Abounds
The self-loathing that untold numbers of white liberals have for whites, in general, is mind-boggling. They have been taught — actually, brainwashed — to regard their ethnicity and skin color as invariably detrimental to society. To them, by virtue of their birth alone, they represent an extreme cultural blight.
This enormous group, tens of millions strong, is comprised largely of Democrats who also happen to comprise the core of cancel culture. These self-loathing guardians seek to financially and politically cremate any person, place, thing, or idea that they regard as offensive to others and, paradoxically, that aren't necessarily directly offensive to themselves.
Why do white liberals act this way? They are self-appointed care-takers of what they believe is social fairness, justice, and equanimity. At the same time, it's eye-opening to discover that most minority individuals are flummoxed by what whites seek to cancel, merely because the white majority thinks it offensive to select minorities.
You dislike The Cat in the Hat? On January 21, 2015, Michelle Obama invited The Cat in the Hat characters to the White House to read to young students as part of her 'Let's Move, Let's Read!' initiative. She noted, "Pretty much all the stuff you need to know is in Dr. Seuss."
Windmill Jousting
Did anybody in attendance that day, Ms. Obama included, regard these characters to be portraying racial stereotypes? Was anybody offended, insulted, or outraged? Newspaper accounts and photographs indicate that just the opposite was true.
So when did The Cat in the Hat and other Dr. Seuss books, and his various characters, become 'racist' as not a single word changed, in any of his books? The quick answer: Self-loathing liberals despise anything which they even remotely suspect somehow disparages minorities.
Ironically, these same self-loathing liberals feel morally superior to everybody else. Thus they exhibit an odd psycho-social phenomenon that researchers will be studying for decades, if not centuries, to come: How individuals, programmed en masse to hate themselves, decided to despoil any aspect of our culture that they believe does not meet their' standards.'
Stranger Than Fiction
These obtuse standards become entrenched as part of liberal, Leftist, unassailable doctrine and spread via the internet like kudzu. And who among them can tolerate debate of official doctrine?
Those on the right observe this phenomenon with incredulity. How do so many people so thoroughly come to hate themselves, especially for phantom faux pas (i.e. that they haven't committed)?
As they proceed with their many forms of boycotts, doxxing, and ostracism, and deepen their embrace of cancel culture, it's difficult to predict when the dam will break. Self-loathing whites, you see, glean positive strokes and virtue signals from one another. They are giddy to be accepted as a member of the 'morally superior' strata of humankind.
Self-loathing liberals are hell bent on their 'righteous mission.' Each one knows to the marrow in his, her, or its bones that unquestionably they are on the 'right side' of history, when in actuality they are on the maniacal side of cultural and social suicide.
– – – – –
No comments:
Post a Comment